Exposing PseudoAstronomy

June 17, 2011

A Fancy Sign Does Not Good Science Make


Introduction

As my first post since my hiatus to finish my degree, I thought I’d bring up a timely topic. Over on the Moon Zoo forums, one of our most active volunteers and forum moderators, a woman who goes by the name of Jules, posted about her time at the Times Cheltenham Science Festival.

From the Festival, Jules posted about her own outreach with Moon Zoo (and those other zoos …). She also took a photo of a particular sign:

Moon Sign at Cheltenham Science Festival

Moon Sign at Cheltenham Science Festival - Original credit, Jules W.

You can click the image to enlarge it. I strongly suggest reading it before moving on.

Let’s Look at the Text

The particular offensive paragraph is the fourth:

“As you have noticed the Moon goes through a number of phases, from full Moon, though to new Moon and back to full Moon. This is because as the Moon orbits, the sunlight that makes it visible can be blocked by the Earth. This means that the amount of the Moon that is illuminated depends upon where the Moon is along its orbit.”

Interesting. I would ask why you can see the sun and moon in the sky at the same time if Earth’s shadow is blocking light, causing the Moon’s phases.

You can also think about a lunar eclipse, such as the one that was visible just this week from most of Europe, Africa, and Asia.

What’s Wrong with This

If you haven’t caught on yet, this is not why we have phases of the moon. The moon orbits Earth approximately once a month. As it orbits, one half is lit by the sun, and the other half is in its own shadow, just as Earth is always half-lit by the sun and half in its own shadow for night. Since the moon keeps one face always looking at Earth, it is slowly rotating relative to the sun and so each point on its surface goes through about two weeks of daylight and two weeks of night.

For a really cool movie illustrating this made by an amazing graphic artist, educator, and scientist, check out this link (22 MB, MOV format).

In other words, this sign is wrong. Blatantly wrong. Clearly wrong. Any little amount of thought put in would indicate that this is wrong (why do we see the moon in any phase other than full at the same time as the sun? we shouldn’t if Earth’s shadow is what causes the phases …).

And yet this sign looks nice, is shiny, has several corporate sponsors, and is presented at a large science festival.

Two More Things

The poster also lists a distance to the Moon as 384,000 km. This is correct. Until Jules pointed out to me that the sign claims this is the distance between the Moon and Sun (which is 149,600,000 km ± 384,000). The 384,000 km is the distance between Earth and the Moon.

A final incorrect statement has to do with the third paragraph which states that the moon having the same side facing Earth has been “very useful as astronomers have been able to map the surface of the Moon using telescopes.” This doesn’t really make sense. I suppose one may be able to claim that it would take us twice as long to map the Moon if we saw the whole thing, but then the nice part would be we’d be able to map the whole thing. We had to wait for the first Soviet flyby to return photographs of the lunar far side before we could even begin to guess what it was like.

Final Thoughts

This gets to the heart of two of the main reasons I do this blog. (1) It shows that all because you have a big fancy sign does not mean that you are right. People have to be ever-vigilant and questioning or they risk falling for something like this. (2) I think people learn better by examining misconceptions / mistakes that they make or others have made. The sign is clearly wrong, but you may not have known why it was wrong — it may have just sounded weird. So now with the actual explanation for phases, you can contrast that with the sign’s explanation which can make it easier to remember.

On a related theme, this sign actually reminds me of a sign I saw in a science museum a few years ago. It was talking about the force of a car crash and how much destructive power a 60 mph (100 kph) car crash has. And then the museum decided to throw in another line about how, “But, according to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, if conditions had been a little different the accident may not have happened at all!”

Yes, that was a science museum. Using a fallacious appeal to quantum mechanics.

Keep a lookout, folks, these things are everywhere. To distort a phrase, the price of knowledge is eternal vigilance against pseudoscience.

7 Comments »

  1. And so back to the distant question….. “if the moon is the cause of the tides (which it is)then why is the tide high every 12 hours and not every 24 hours” ??? and don’t give me “the far side of the earth is further from the moon” nonsense.

    Comment by Mick — June 19, 2011 @ 3:40 am | Reply

  2. “Gray arrows represent the magnitude of force towards the moon, and green arrows represent the magnitude of force away from the moon.”

    “These act to create a “net” (total) force where, on the side closer to the moon the pull is to the moon, and on the side farther from the moon the pull is away from the moon.”

    “Pull away from the moon”???? how does gravity do that?? You see this is as bad as the pamphlet you show.

    Consider that the Earth/ Moon system is a BINARY system (and you know how they orbit) and you will get the correct reason for two tides a day. The point being that it is easy to fall for the explanations of others.

    “the price of knowledge is eternal vigilance against pseudoscience.”

    Comment by Mick — June 20, 2011 @ 2:12 am | Reply

  3. Shouldn’t the night temperature on the moon be colder than the day temperature? I think somebody left out a minus sign for the night temperature.

    Comment by Douglas Desrosiers — November 4, 2014 @ 12:59 pm | Reply

    • Yup.

      Comment by Stuart Robbins — November 4, 2014 @ 3:26 pm | Reply

  4. In the animation he has forgotten to have the orbiting moon graphic rotate to keep the same face towards Earth. When trying to show this to a child, this makes it hard to reconcile the non-changing face in the changing phase with the blatantly different view shown by the orbiting graphic, and requires a distracting explanation of the error. But nicely done as an animation.

    Comment by Chris — April 12, 2015 @ 3:46 am | Reply

    • My mistake, the little moon graphic is rotating. Nice.

      Comment by Chris — April 12, 2015 @ 3:54 am | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: